Action of the police since. Meaning no action.

Metropolitan Police U.K. : http://www.met.police.uk/

Action of the police since the assault and battery in April 2005

The police never treated me like a victim. There was has been no contact since I was threatened with death and severely beaten by the assailant. My letters have been in vain. I wrote to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner twice by delivery recorded. I did not get a reply. There is no evidence that the police commissioner told his officers to sit up and investigate thecase properly.

I do not know how far or in fact if anything, is being done to prosecute the assailant. I do not know about the witnesses who urged on and incited the assailant that night. From all indications, nothing is being done else they would have told me, afterall the case will not be charged to court without the victim's knmowledge or evidence.

In the afternoon of Wednesday, four days after the battery in April 2005, two detectives came to my house. They were not uniformed and on my enquiry said they had no car.
One of the detectives looked at my room and said "you can clean your room now". When I asked why it was not photographed since the last Saturday, surely four days was enough to get a camera, he replied "I do not know about that" and they walked off.

I believe it is certainly not true in the 21st century that a detective in Britain would say he does not know about photographing evidence. I certainly cannot see a good reason why a detective would ask me to destroy evidence.

I believe it was a deliberate attempt by the detective to give me false directions and that it is fraudulent in intent. This is certainly an offence within and contrary to the Police Code of Conduct see Reg 3 SI 645 of 2004 and other statutes.

Since April till date, I have not heard from the police. There was no referral to victim support, no update on the case, no photographing of the evidence (which is still awaiting their camera as I write).

I have involved other instuitutions that are dragging theit feet. I personally delivered two letters to the Attorney General but unfortunately, there has been no action from his position.


You think secret cults are harmless? Well, wait till you see how they steal, kill and destroy everything in sight and pervert the whole system.

Legal facts on criminal acts by the police

Facts on criminal acts by the police against my person and the United Kingdom:


A)Shielding of crime committed and the offender: all offences within s 4 (1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967:

. Refusal to investigate a reported offence of the assailant having administered poison (by insecticide) in Feb 2005: an act contrary to Offences Against The Persons Act 1861 s 24.

. Refusal to investigate a reported a reported offence of wounding and grievous bodily harm by the assailant unlawfully and maliciously administering poison (insecticide) in Feb 2005:an act contrary to Offences Against The Person Act 1861 s 23.

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial, and diligent manner, a reported offence of the assailant threatening to kill the victim with a weapon on the 23rd April 2005: an act contrary to the Offences Against The Persons Act 1861 s 16.

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported offence of the assailant assaulting then occasioning actual body harm on the victim on the 23rd of April 2005: an act contrary to the Offences Against The Persons Act 1861 s 47.

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported offence of the assailant assaulted and battered the victim on the 23rd April 2005: an act contrary to the Criminal Justice Act 1988 s 39.

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported offence of the assailant intimidating the victim on the 23rd April 2005: an act contrary to the Criminal justice and Public Order Act of 1994 s 51 (1) and (2).

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported act of the assailant harassing the victim on the 23rd April 2005: an offence within the Protection From Harassment Act of 1997 s 2 and 4.

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported act of the assailant being racially abusive to the victim on 23rd April 2005: an offence within the Public Order Act of 1986 s 18(1).

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported act of the assailant committing malicious wounding, grievous bodily harm against the victim on the 23rd April 2005, (an offence within the Offences Against The Person Act 1861 s 20) which is racially aggravated: an offence within the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 s 29 (1) (a).

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported an act of the assailant committing actual bodily harm against the victim on 23rd April 2005, (an offence within s 47 of the Offences Against The Person Act 1861) which is racially aggravated: Crime and Disorder Act 1998 s 29 (1) (b.

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported act of the assailant committing common assault against the victim on the 23rd April 2005: an offence within the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 s 29 (1) (c).

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported act of the assailant destroying the victim’s property on the 23rd April 2005: an offence within the Criminal Damage Act 1971 s (1) (2).

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported act of the assailant destroying the victim’s property (an offence within s 1(1) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971) which is racially aggravated: an offence within the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 s 30 (1).

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported act of the assailant committing wounding and grievous bodily by any means, against the victim: an offence within the Offences Against The Person Act 1861 s 18.

. Refusal to investigate in a conscientious, fair, impartial and diligent manner, a reported act of the assailant committing wounding and grievous bodily harm with or without weapon or instrument, against the victim: an offence within the Offences Against The Person Act 1861 s 20.

B) Examples of methods employed by the police men in shielding

a) Refusal to act when victim was poisoned: on the 28th February 2005, I reported at the police station (ref: CRIMINT....) that the assailant and her brother poisoned me with insecticide. The officers at the station refused to investigate an act by the assailant of having administered poison (by insecticide) in Feb 2005: an offence within the Offences Against The Persons Act 1861 s 24.

In furtherance of shielding a crime and an offender, the police refused to send me a copy of my complaint as logged in their records, till today. This is contrary to the Freedom of Information Act and clearly shows the lack of respect for the law, at least when it concerns me.

b) Refusal to search for the weapon: On the 23rd April 2005, the police officers refused to search for the weapon that was used for the threatening me with death i.e. the six inches knife (about two inches wide and tapered to a nib, a nib that was pressed against my throat). When they came to the house, everyone was there including the assailant.

It is obvious that a conscientious, fair, impartial, and diligent police officer would immediately ask and check for the violent weapon. These officers refused to ask for, check for or search for the weapon.

One of the primary duties of the police is the detection of crime. By this action, these officers acted against their primary duty and against the law, within s 1, 2, 5, 6, 12 and notes (a) & (c) SI 645 2004 Regulation 3.

c) Refusal to record the description of the weapon: again, the victim described the weapon to the police officer when he later went to the station. The officer refused to write the description of the weapon, see victim’s statement. Clearly, he was shielding the crime and the assailant.

d) Refusal to arrest the assailant: Although, there was no evidence seen by the victim, the police claimed to have arrested the assailant that night i.e. 23/04/05. If she was arrested, why did the police officers not return to the scene of the crime to search for the weapon? WHY ARREST AND NOT INVESTIGATE OR SEARCH FOR THE WEAPON? The action of these officers is contrary to the law: see s18 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.

a) If the assailant was truly arrested, then the following should proof:
1) CCTV records of the station
2) Custody records
3) Interview records
4) Tape records including the sealed and signed master tape
5) Police notebook.

I believe that a check of the above will confirm that she was not arrested.

b) On arrest, did the assailant not call a solicitor? Is there any evidence of the presence of a solicitor e.g. on CCTV, signed forms, etc.

c)If the assailant was arrested as claimed by the police officers and later freed on bail, what were the conditions for granting bail?

d)If the assailant was arrested, was her alcohol level done, was she examined by the police surgeon?
e)

B. BLACKMAILING AND INTIMIDATING THE VICTIM AT HOME
The police officer called me to a corner and said the assailant had made counter-allegations against me saying that I had pressed a knife against her throat. I replied that I wanted the case pursued to court and that I was ready to do a lie-detector test. The officer then countered that the police usually do not do such a test. I replied that I would pay for one (lie-detector test).

Few minutes later, the same officer then advised me that the assailant had withdrawn her counter-allegations and that a WARNING would be issued to her and that I should let matters be. I REFUSED.

This police officer intimidated me with false counter-allegations and made me scared even more, after just escaping death with a knife pressed at my neck, near my carotid. He wanted me to let matters be at all costs and was now playing the role of a blackmailer and negotiator on behalf of the assailant.

His actions constitute offences within:
s 51 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
s 39 (1) of the Criminal and Police Act 2001
s 40 (10 of the Criminal and Police Act 2001 and
s 4 (1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967

C. INTIMIDATING THE VICTIM AT ILFORD STATION, (night of 23/004/05)

2. In the windowless room, when I told him several times that I wanted what he had written corrected he threatened to lock me up, bringing out handcuffs. I could not imagine being threatened by an officer when I had just escaped death with a knife pressed against my throat. I told the officer to go ahead and stretched out my hands to him reminding him that in the bible, St. Paul was locked up innocently.
I had just escaped being murdered about an hour earlier and here was the police officer intimidating me for saying the truth should be written down.

This intimidation constitutes an offence contrary to:
s 51 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
s 39 (1) of the Criminal and Police Act 2001
s 40 (10 of the Criminal and Police Act 2001 and
s 4 (1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967

D. EVIDENCE

The police officers refused to take evidence. Their actions can only lead to one result, a lack of or poor evidence and a poor prosecution. This also corresponds with the following:

When I told the interviewing officer that I insist the case must go to court, he replied that is if the CPS decides to prosecute, in a manner that seemed to imply that it is unlikely, that goal will be achieved.
By their actions, the policemen, clearly and deliberately acted to frustrate any and/or proper prosecution of the assailant.

Direct and real evidence police response

1. Knife refused to check for knife, refused to write its description in victim’s statement

2. Torn shirt refused to take it as evidence. Victim had to argue and abandon it with the interviewing police officer and the police woman manning the desk.

3. Property destroyed including thermometer Police officers did not take thermometer and hydrometer as evidence

Documentary evidence

1. Photograph of assailant’s bites on victim did not take photograph of the bites; did not advise victim to go to the hospital to have bite wounds documented.

2. Photograph of victim’s door torn did not take photograph of the door torn off the hinges hinges

3. Chicken stew (victim’s) strewn over floor. Did not take photograph or video. Initially claimed it was absence of equipment. Later, refused to take photo or video.

4. Okro soup (victim’s) strewn over the floor Did not take photograph or video. Initially claimed it was absence of equipment. Later, refused to take photo or video.

E. BREAKING THE POLICE CODE OF CONDUCT see reg 3 of SI no. 645 of 2004

Honesty and integrity

Fairness and impartiality

Conscientiousness and diligence

Obey all lawful orders and abide by the provisions of legislation applicable to the police.

Officers should support their colleagues in the execution of their lawful duties, and oppose any improper behaviour, reporting it where appropriate.

Whether on or off duty, police officers should not behave in a way, which is likely to bring discredit on the police force.

The primary duty of those who hold the office of constable are the protection of life and property, the preservation of public peace and the prevention and detection of crimes. To fulfil these duties, they are granted extraordinary powers; the public and police service therefore have the right to expect the highest standards of conduct from them.

Accordingly, any allegation of conduct which could, if proved, bring or likely to bring discredit to the police service should be investigated in order to establish whether or not a breach of the code has occurred and whether formal disciplinary action is appropriate.

F. DUTY OF THE POLICE see S 21 SI no. 265 of 1995
Every member of a police force shall carry out all lawful orders and shall all times punctually and promptly perform all appointed duties and attend to all matters within the scope of his office as a constable

F. PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE
There has been a series of acts, which have been intended to and have a tendency to pervert the course of justice contrary to common law.
The course of justice starts from when the assailant burst into victim’s room against his expressed wishes and she started with assault proceeding into other criminal acts. From that moment, it is expected (and reasonably so) that a criminal investigation would follow.

A few of the criminal acts that the officers have done include:

1. Persuading and attempting to persuade by intimidation, the victim to keep silent about a series of criminal acts that have been done by the assailant.

2. Presenting false counter-allegations and blackmail against the victim with a view to avoiding police investigation and prosecution of the assailant.
Giving false information to the victim, with a view to frustrating a police investigation e.g. telling the victim that all the acts of the assailant, which are contrary to the law (see a – q in criminal acts by the assailant, Susan) all constitute racially aggravated assault which will be investigated by the Community Relations Police, and that they (Community Relations Police) would come and take a statement from the victim two days later

A detective telling the victim to destroy evidence and claiming not to know about photography and its role in evidence is giving false information.

3. Refusal to carry out the primary duties of a police officer i.e. detection of crime and in so doing shielding a crime and an offender, a repeat offender against the same victim contrary to statutes: see SI 645 of 2004

4. Refusal to collect evidence as already detailed e.g. refusal to collect the victim’s shirt torn by the assailant. Falsely claiming not to know about the role of evidence in prosecution by asking why should we collect the shirt.

There are so many more examples already stated in this complaint and the statutes that the police officers have acted contrary to. In order to avoid duplicity, I have presented the few above.

Criminal acts by the police officers against the victim

Criminal Acts by the police officers against the me and against the state (United Kingdom):

a) Shielding of crime: Criminal Law Act 1967 s 5 (1)

b) Shielding of crime: Criminal Justice Act 1967 s 4 (1)

c) Intimidation of a victim of crime: Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 s 51 (1) and (2)

d) Intimidation of a victim of crime: Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 s 40 (1

e) Threatening a victim of crime: Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 s 51 (2)

f) Threatening a victim of crime: Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 s 40 (1)

g) Harassment of a victim of crime: Protection From Harassment Act 1997 s 2 and s 4

h) Maliciously inflicting severe pain and suffering on a victim of crime: by instigating the assailant and/or acquiescence of its public duty in the performance or purported performance of its duty: Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 s 51 (1) and (2)

i) Perverting the course of justice: maliciously, deliberately and culpably neglected to perform the duties of the police: common law.

j) Preventing the victim from enjoying his human rights as guaranteed by law: Human Rights Act 1998

k) Refusal to carry out duties as enshrined in law: see Reg 3 of SI 645 of 2004

And you think in a first world country like the U.K., everybody is equal before the law and the law is upheld ? Thnk again. There is no law as far as satanic cults are concerned.

They are sponsored by satan, whose only function is to steal, kill and destroy.

Hold your breath, there is still more on the destrcutive power of evil cults.

U.K. April 2005: that night she battered me, the police bullied and blackmailed me, lying all the way. They refused to investigate a violent crime.

April 2005, action of Police Officers when they arrived on the night she battered me and held a knife to my throat

I was too shocked, stunned and embarrassed (she being a woman) and scared to call the police. From the action of the witnesses (they had kept quiet while she rained punches on me, but the moment my hand touched her face whilst reling in shock, they shouted you hit her, you hit a woman, inciting her) I knew she had their backing and I was not sure of what could happen.

At the same time, I hesitated to be bold to call the police because the thought occurred to me that she (my assailant) would be jailed. It was all mixed emotions for me, in the midst of severe pains. I was relieved to find that the police was called.

The three police officers attended my house in response to the emergency call. They were in uniform. I am not sure exactly what time they came, but I am sure 999 will have a record of when they were called.

Is there any reader out there who has access to check 999 calls. If you do, send a message so we can confirm the time of the call.

When the officers arrived, they asked me what happened and I told them. They saw my torn shirt and the bite marks on my left forearm. They saw the destruction in my room with the door ripped off the hinges, chicken stew and okra soup strewn all over the floor, my thermometer broken and everything chaotic.

It is unfortunate that the police officers did not write notes or take statements from any of the witnesses or myself, at the scene of the crime.

The police officers did not ask for, check for or search for the offensive weapon, the six-inch blade knife which the assailant pressed against my throat whilst threatening to kill me.

One of the officers called me to a corner and said the assailant had made counter-allegations against me that I had pressed a knife to her throat. I told him I wanted to take the matter up and that I was ready to do a lie detector test. The officer said they (police) don’t usually do such a test. I replied that I would pay for one. He went away to where the others were (assailant, officers and witnesses).

Few minutes later, the same officer came and advised me that the assailant had withdrawn her counter-allegations and that a WARNING would be issued to her and that I should let matters be. I REFUSED.

The same officer then advised me that since this is a racially aggravated assault, the Community Relations Police would come and write a statement and take evidence the next working day, i.e. on Monday, two days later.

The officers then wanted to know if I would go to the police station to report the matter again. I asked them if they would take me in their car to the station and they refused.

They then asked me repeatedly if I would go to the station to report the matter again. I became suspicious and did not reply.

The police officers got a radio message and explained that there was some fracas in the neighbourhood and drove off with a final word that statements will be taken from me on Monday (i.e. two days later) by the Community Relations Police.

Action of the police at the police station.

That same night after the policemen had gone, I left for the police station to report the matter again. I decided to go to the station as I was concerned about the events and the way the matter was being handled by the police. I was very suspicious.

At the reception area of the police station

At the station I met a police officer on duty manning the reception. On enquiry, I related briefly, how I had been assaulted and battered by my assailant.

The officer was going to take a statement from me right in the open by the side counter (which is what happened earlier on, in February 2005, when I reported the assailant for poisoning me with insecticide). But one of the officers who had earlier come to my house (and left after the emergency radio call to the fracas) appeared from the offices at the back.

This officer instructed the reception officer not to take a statement from me, insisting he would do so himself. But he was busy writing notes on the desk at the back. I complained that I would prefer the lady who was free to take my statement (I was in pain and very tired, shocked and all) but he refused. I had to wait for him.

Interview room

The officer took me to a windowless room inside with a mirror at the corner. He refused to let me write by myself. He insisted on writing himself against my stated wish. Since it was a case of either he writes it or there would be no documentation of my being assaulted, battered or threatened with a knife pressed to my neck, I was forced to cooperate.

He wrote down a number of sentences to downplay the effect of my words. He wrote I did not want the police to be called whereas I told him that one of the thoughts that occurred to me was that the assailant (my neighbours wife) might be jailed. I did not admit it but I was too stunned, scared and embarrassed (she being a female and I the male). It was all mixed emotions for me in the midst of severe pains. Moreover, I knew that she (my assailant) had the backing of the witnesses and I was not sure what could happen.

The officer wrote I am willing to go to court where as what I said was I want to go to court
Although I gave him the description of the blade of the knife about six inches, triangular in shape with the base of the blade about two inches and tapering to the pointed end which was pressed against my throat, he refused to write it down. I reminded him but he refused to write it down. (At the end of the interview he wrote only part of the description of the knife).

In the windowless room, when I told him several times that I wanted some of the words he had written corrected, he threatened to lock me up, bringing out hand cuffs. I could not imagine being threatened by an officer when I had just escaped death with a knife pressed to my throat.

I told the officer to go ahead and stretched out my hands to him (for the hand cuffs) reminding him that in the bible, St. Paul was locked up innocently.

He refused to write the names of the assailant which I gave him. That would have made an obvious link to a previous criminal offence by the same assailant against the same victim, myself.

The officer told me that my assailant had been arrested that night although I never saw any evidence of that throughout the time the police spent in my house or at the station.

Whilst we were still in the windowless room and towards the end of writing the victim’s statement, someone (white, bulky build) in a black overcoat darted from the interior door, across the room and went through the front door. That individual could have witnessed the proceedings including the threats I received from the police officer.

When I told the police officer that I insist the case must go to court he replied that is if the CPS decides to prosecute in a manner that seemed to imply that it is unlikely that goal would be achieved.


Back to the reception area of the police station

We left the room to the reception area. The duty reception officer was there.

When I asked why photographs were not taken, the interviewing officer said because they are short-staffed that night and they do not have the equipment.

I continued to tell the interviewing officer to write some points in the victim’s statement. He refused but was not threatening now (in the open and in the presence of the desk officer). I took the chance and decided to write some points in my statement although not enough of what I wanted.

I had to argue and insist vigorously but the officers did not want to take my shirt (which was torn by the assailant) as exhibit. He asked me why should we take the shirt and I replied because it is evidence I am black so with all the punches she has given me, I cannot turn red for you to see the effect. The torn shirt is one of the key evidence to show that she was violent to my person along with the bite marks that you have seen.

Despite this they refused to take the shirt and I had to leave it with them at the counter and I told them so. I decided to leave it with them on the reception desk and told them so.

There was no hint of what to do, no advice to go to the hospital or advice/assistance in any form at the police station. On my own, I left the station for the hospital to have my injuries recorded and treated. Till today, the police have not bothered to ask me if I went to the hospital and had my injuries documented with a view to prosecution.

Still much more to come!

You will see for your self, the destructiveness of satanic cults, and why they should be stopped.

The bible says, the only function of satan is to steal, kill and destroy.

U.K. 2005: prior boasting by her husband: 'even if you report the matter to the police, nothing will happen!'

Background.

a) Previously she poisoned me.

In February 2005, I went to the police station and reported that my neighbour and her brother, both of whom live with her husband in the room opposite mine had been poisoning me.

Both of them had been poisoning me with insecticide, spraying it around me so many times especially if I go to cook in the kitchen. Once I start cooking, one of them would come into the kitchen and see some imaginary insect and begin to spray insecticide. By the time I return to my room to eat, they would have sprayed the corridor and my room.

At the police station, the duty officer took a statement from me and gave me a reference number. I asked for a copy of my complaint but he refused to give me one.

The next day I was concerned that the police had not even come to the house to question the assailant and her brother. I wrote a letter to the police.

Almost 3 weeks later, having not heard from the police, I wrote another letter to them. Till date, I am yet to receive a reply.

b) Previous harassment by the assailant and relations

I continued to receive harassment from the assailant, her family and the other co-tenant. This included verbal racial abuse, physically blocking the corridor to prevent me from passing, staining the shirts I washed and physical assaults.

As a Christian, I endured a lot. More than once, the assailant's brother and the co-tenanat assaulted me. This happened especially when they are drunk. They would taunt and seek to provoke me as if wanting me to fight with them but by the grace of God, I endured it. Her brother would come and switch off the cooker with my food cooking me standing by.

Also, I was fed up with a police force that did not investigate my complaint that they had poisoned me with insecticide.

c) Previous boast by assailant’s husband

I warned them that I am God’s child and the bible says 'touch not my anointed, do my prophet no harm' but they would not listen.

On one occasion, I told the assailant's husband about the harassment I received from his folks that day. He replied that it was my word against three of them and that the police would believe them since they are three. I asked him if he had ever heard of a lie detector test he replied no but that it is not relevant. I told him to go to the library and read about it.

On another occasion a few days before she battered me, I told her husband that I would report his folks to the police. He replied: I am very well connected. My brother works at the police station. Even if you report any matter to the police, nothing will happen.

CAN YOU IMAGINE SOMEONE BOASTING ABOUT POLICE CONNECTIONS AND BEING ABOVE THE LAW IN THE U.K. IN 2005! as if we are in a banana republic?

Well, hold your breath, you are in for much stronger shocks that register 10 on the richter scale.

You will soon see the destructive power of secret cults.

But do not over estimate their power. They are satanic agents, out to destroy. But their power (if you call the ability to destroy power, I don't) is far below the power of Jesus Christ.

If you truly worship God, then they are under your power as well.

April 2005: she battered me and pressed a knife against my throat threatening to kill me

She assaulted me, battered me and pressed a knife against my throat, threatening to kill me.

On the night of Saturday 23rd April 2005, I cooked some noodles in the communal kitchen at my residence. I returned to my room, sat down and finished eating the noodles. I was just going to start eating my coleslaw when my neighbour’s wife burst into my room, pushing open the door. We have never been friends. I have never entered their room and discouraged any of their family from entering mine.

She came close to me and shouted go and clean the cooker, clean it now, you black bastard. I noticed that she smelt of alcohol. I knew I had not left the cooker dirty and that it was a ruse because she had been abusive before; besides I had reported her to the police previously, when she poisoned me with insecticide.

I told her, I could not stand up immediately and that I would check the cooker when I finish eating. I advised her that as a Muslim woman wearing the black dress, she should not enter another man’s room, more so without his permission. Before I could finish speaking, she got violent and tore my shirt.

I asked her why she tore my shirt but she just started hitting me with slaps and punches. She is a big woman and every one of the punches hurt. I was just to stunned, that I did nothing to defend myself. I resorted to counting the blows and slaps aloud. When I had counted 25 blows and was hurting, I tried to block one of her punches and slaps. My hand must have touched her face. The three witnesses who were watching and had said nothing all the while, now shouted You hit her, you hit a woman.

Emboldened, she began to hit me with more punches and slaps. She bit me at least 2 or 3 times, with a very noticeable bite mark on my left forearm (As I write today, 02/06/05, the mark is still present). She left my room for theirs opposite, and returned with a kitchen knife. The knife had a blade at least 6 inches long and 2 inches wide and tapered from the base to the tip. She pressed the tip against my throat shouting you think you are special, I could just finish you off now, you black bastard (I am not sure if she called me black prick or black bastard or black cunt, she has called me all three before). I was just so scared but I put my faith in God.

She up my two pots of food, one chicken stew and the other okra soup and threw the contents on the floor of my room and the corridor. Then she ripped the door of my room off its hinges and destroyed other things like my clock.

The three witnesses were her brother, her relation or in-law (a young female) who had been staying with them for a few weeks and lastly, a co-tenant, a young man who had his hair dyed yellow ( Some days later he shaved his hair).

She is a big woman and I guess she would weigh about 90 or more kilograms, so her slaps and punches really hurt.

I have never given permission to her or any other person to enter my room. I have not been a friend to her or her family. Very occasionally, I might have said hello to her family members but that is about it.

After she had calmed down a bit, her brother came in and gave me a head butt. He said it was for hitting a woman despite witnessing what happened.

Her husband came in later. After discussing with his folks, he shouted at me that he was told I had hit a woman. I was just too shocked to answer back and kept quiet. He calmed down and proceeded with the co-tenant to clean the chicken stew stains from the corridor, stains that his wife had done.

At about 22:45 hours, very shocked, confused and in great pain, as I was going to the toilet, I saw the co-tenant and her bother in the corridor. I told them that one of the reason’s I did not call the police was that I felt she would go to jail. Behold, she emerged from behind and threw a glass of what smelt like alcohol on my face and shirt.

The landlady and her son soon arrived and in front of them, she punched me in the left eye, calling me a black cunt. I saw stars with that punch.

Not too long after, the police arrived.